Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Major austerity measures coming in a few months?

Yesterday, Latvian government announced plans to cut more than 100 mln lats (140 mln euros) of spending from this year's budget. The cuts will be mainly to purchases by state organizations and to public administration expenses. A detailed plan is being developed and a vote on spending cuts is expected to be later in the summer.

It's a big amount in cuts. The basic Latvian state budget (excluding social security and municipal budgets) is around 3.5 bln lats (5 bln euros) and, by the time when the changes are passed, most of that will already be spent.

I'm not sure if I agree with this plan. There is no shortfall in Latvian tax revenues yet. State Revenue Service monthly data for first 4 months of 2008 show revenue in two months below the plan and in two months above the plan. On the whole, the tax revenues for first 4 months are a negligible amount of 1.5 mln lats (2 mln euros) below the plan. This hardly justifies such a drastic action...

Also, the Latvian economy is slowing down rapidly and cutting the government spending at this moment can make it even worse. (In their announcement, the government promised to do the cuts in a way that affects the economy least, but how much of that is actually possible?) Our government was very slow with the measures to keep the economy from overheating and it looks like they might be equally slow with stimulating it, when it slows down.

UPDATE (6/12): A more detailed report claims that the government needs to cut expenses by 263 mlns lats (375 mlns euros) if they want to maintain the plan budget surplus of 1% GDP, as planned, and by 108 mlns if they want to have no surplus but no deficit. If that's the case, the cuts are somewhat justified but I still don't see the evidence of 263 mln revenue shortfall...

UPDATE (6/16): After 5 months, the overall state budget shows a surplus of 273 mln lats. It's true that there are more purchases made at the end of year (slowness of Latvian government institutions) but I still don't see how one would get from a surplus of 273 mln to a deficit of 108 mln in the remaining 7 months.

Developing...

4 comments:

hk said...

saw this article about small revaluation in Vietnam http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121309913423660417.html

thought of Latvia and why do people keep savings in lats when inflation eats away 15%/yr. I can't imagine banks pay nearly enough in interest to cover loses on deposits. Unless, there's very little savings, then inflation lessens some of the debt burden

hk said...

saw this article about small revaluation in Vietnam http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121309913423660417.html

thought of Latvia and why do people keep savings in lats when inflation eats away 15%/yr. I can't imagine banks pay nearly enough in interest to cover loses on deposits. Unless, there's very little savings, then inflation lessens some of the debt burden

Latvian abroad said...

First of all, there is indeed more debt than savings.

Second, lat is pegged to euro and a substantial number of Latvians believe that the peg is safe.

Under that belief, holding savings in lats and euros is effectively equivalent. And the local interest rates on lat deposits are actually higher (7-9%, compared to 4-5% for euros), so holding savings in lats makes some sense.

Scott said...

Hi, I enjoy your blog. More about the Lat pegged to the euro.

See link :
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&grid=A1YourView&xml=/money/2008/06/16/bcnecb116.xml

<< quote
Morgan Stanley doubts that Europe's monetary union will break up under pressure, but it warns that corked pressures will have to find release one way or another.

This will most likely occur through property slumps and banking purges in the vulnerable countries of the Club Med region and the euro-satellite states of Eastern Europe.

"The tensions will not disappear into thin air. They will find fault lines on the periphery of Europe. Painful macro adjustments are likely to take place. Pegs to the euro could be questioned," said the report, written by Eric Chaney, Carlos Caceres, and Pasquale Diana.

>> end quote


I agree that the Lat is unlikely to lose its pegging, as long as it plays the international money game (free market concessions, cuts in public spending etc). If the Lat does float free, (perhaps due to some power play between the ECB and the Federal Reserve) I think the partially built new flats dotted around the landscape of Riga will be just the tip of a massive slump.